Slow response (case study)

The organisation's development programme was well established in the area with long-term goals which had been carefully thought through.

Fighting in the neighbouring country resulted in 100,000s of refugees crossing the border into the programme area. The organisation, which had a well-established reputation for water and sanitation, wanted to respond rapidly. The country team on the other hand were concerned that their long term goals would be threatened; they resisted and frustrated attempts to send in an emergency team.

The team did finally arrive – but was only setting up its base camp by the time other organisations were declaring that the acute emergency phase was over.

Everyone lost – the refugees and the host population suffered unnecessarily, the organisation's reputation and confidence were shaken, and eventually many of the country team resigned.

 

This page was last updated by Phil Wilks on 28 April 2010 at 12:14:45 (2 years ago). View page history (1 version).